PvdA pleit voor vertrek baas VN-klimaatpanel

Now the IPCC sexed up the Amazonian danger, too

UN climate chief Rajendra Pachauri 'got grants through bogus claims'

Djambi schreef:

Tijdens de opwarming van de aarde is het hoofd van Samson verhit geraakt.Gelukkig voor hem loopt het niet zo'n vaart met de opwarming en kan hij bij deze temperaturen
zijn hoofd weer koel houden.En nog wat Minster Cramer kan weer met vliegtuig.

ScienceDaily schreef:
Amplification of Global Warming by Carbon-Cycle Feedback Significantly Less Than Thought, Study Suggests

Nature schreef:
Water vapour could be behind warming slowdown

Science schreef:
Contributions of Stratospheric Water Vapor to Decadal Changes in the Rate of Global Warming

MailOnline schreef:
Water vapour a 'major cause of global warming and cooling'

Surface Temperature Records: Policy Driven Deception?

Summary schreef:
1. Instrumental temperature data for the pre-satellite era (1850-1980) have been so widely, systematically, and unidirectionally tampered with that it cannot be credibly asserted there has been any significant “global warming” in the 20th century. 2. All terrestrial surface-temperature databases exhibit very serious problems that render them useless for determining accurate long-term temperature trends. 3. All of the problems have skewed the data so as greatly to overstate observed warming both regionally and globally. 4. Global terrestrial temperature data are gravely compromised because more than three-quarters of the 6,000 stations that once existed are no longer reporting. 5. There has been a severe bias towards removing higher-altitude, higher-latitude, and rural stations, leading to a further serious overstatement of warming. 6. Contamination by urbanization, changes in land use, improper siting, and inadequately-calibrated instrument upgrades further overstates warming. 7. Numerous peer-reviewed papers in recent years have shown the overstatement of observed longer term warming is 30-50% from heat-island contamination alone. 8. Cherry-picking of observing sites combined with interpolation to vacant data grids may make heat-island bias greater than 50% of 20th-century warming. 9. In the oceans, data are missing and uncertainties are substantial. Comprehensive coverage has only been available since 2003, and shows no warming. 10. Satellite temperature monitoring has provided an alternative to terrestrial stations in compiling the global lower-troposphere temperature record. Their findings are increasingly diverging from the station-based constructions in a manner consistent with evidence of a warm bias in the surface temperature record. 11. NOAA and NASA, along with CRU, were the driving forces behind the systematic hyping of 20th-century “global warming”. 12. Changes have been made to alter the historical record to mask cyclical changes that could be readily explained by natural factors like multidecadal ocean and solar changes. 13. Global terrestrial data bases are seriously flawed and can no longer be trusted to assess climate trends or VALIDATE model forecasts. 14. An inclusive external assessment is essential of the surface temperature record of CRU, GISS and NCDC “chaired and paneled by mutually agreed to climate scientists who do not have a vested interest in the outcome of the evaluations.” 15. Reliance on the global data by both the UNIPCC and the US GCRP/CCSP also requires a full investigation and audit.

Miskoop schreef:


Hij heeft nu een roman uitgebracht, "Return to Almora"
Gaat niet over het klimaat, maar het gaat vooral over sex en daar komt wel warmte bij vrij.